1. Rubin believes that Coca-cola is very lucrative and effective in tailoring their ads to the modern day culture, and that we can gain insight into trends of today by analyzing the ads that companies provide us with. The evidence is shown mostly in her first ad, just after World War 2, supporting military and a male dominated society of the time.
2. The context Rubin provides is in World War 2 and just before the Korean War, which is her biggest example which she refers back to repeatedly in the essay. The information shows how her argument is valid continuing from then on and into today's society.
3. We can see what the culture and politics of the day think of their people in ads, but we cannot generalize too greatly with these evidences as the companies are trying to appeal to specific demographics. We can really see what companies are hearing about from the media by seeing what they put in their ads, though we still would need further analysis of the media than an ad to answer the questions about how our culture is.
4. I could not find a contemporary ad as I do not watch modern day contemporary or TV commercials as much, and most are idealized video game commercials.
5.An ad I know of is the ad for the video game Dying Light, a parkour oriented game where the player is able to climb and move about through the world while zombies creep below. It shows the thrill of movement and parkour that many Americans see and wish for, pumping the adrenaline and going through fighting. The words in the ad "Good night, Good Luck" present a feeling of the night being dangerous in the world that the player inhabits, wishing them luck to bring a more personal attachment.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
How I use analysis
Decision
|
How much I’ll eat in the day
|
What time to go to bed
|
How much time to play video games
|
Career
|
Factors
|
What I like, what we can get easily, and what is there.
|
If there’s something tomorrow I have to do, what time I need to be
somewhere.
|
If I’m bored, if I’ve got time, if I have everything needed done.
|
If I want to, if it’s attainable, if it’s sustainable.
|
Personal effect
|
Satisfaction
|
Level of rest and revival
|
Entertained and relieving stress
|
A job having fun in would make me happy |
Professional effect
|
Could effect workplace breath
|
Higher focus if slept a good time
|
Able to focus later in work if I have a goal from playing
|
Experience for future advancement and happiness
|
School effect
|
Good appearance if healthy amounts
|
Good learning ability in a rested mind.
|
Takes time away from schoolwork
|
Pays for education, or just living expenses.
|
The adaptation and change between Essay #1 and Essay #2 experience
I found that writing the first essay was new and almost foreign as I'd not expected it so soon after the beginning of the year. Though, I will say it was exciting to be able to express freely my own thoughts and story for others to see, it nearly invigorated me to the point of prime happiness. It was fresh, fast, and fun to do while seeing the growth of others around me and how they saw my own growth.
To contrast, I found that the second essay was much more relaxed to the pace that I grew accustomed to. The initial draft was a good size, corrections were made readily, and we started writing it much earlier than the first essay. The fun factor increased in that more outside input was gathered and I had a better understanding of the outside viewpoints around me and those whom I met were very critical but not harsh about their responses. I can't tell what I would've done given the same experience with number one, but the third and final essay will definitely rise in excitement just as #1 has to #2.
The difference in reasons and motive for the two essays was a much larger change, because in the narrative I was simply telling from my point of view and what I saw from a factual and witness statement. However, in a position paper I was forced to go out and get what others had seen and done, and the interpersonal contact and some interviews I had arranged made it more emotional than the narrative, granting a much bigger freedom and exciting outlook on the essay.
Though a larger difference between my essays was their topic, I found that the blogging tool allowed me to look back on drafts from anywhere I wanted and had more stages, which filled me with a sense of accomplishment and gave me more motivation to continue onward. Each in-between assignment also helped fill in and refine the second essay to a more professional level, whereas the first was simply a "What are we capable of" in a sense, at least it was how I felt.
Where the essays had the greatest difference in was the time-frame that we did them. The first essay was still well into the winter, whereas in a position paper we're in winter to spring, a time of change and to move on, to see new things blooming. I found it symbolic and very uplifting to fill the page with words of wisdom and guidance to the positions I spoke out for.
The similarities now of the two are that they had both been done in at least one draft on this blog, but the more there were in this second one, the more stages there are to look back on and adjust the essay to. Plus, we had each other to speak to and rely on for assistance in varying points that we didn't notice in both times. The only difference in that being how many times we as a group did so. There is a more personal impression in seeing the writings and opinions of your friends while they are reading and accrediting yours in any manner. At times though, I still feel as if I wasn't going easy enough into a topic which I was passionate about, and it might harm my credibility later on, but I cannot judge or tell until the final call comes.
To contrast, I found that the second essay was much more relaxed to the pace that I grew accustomed to. The initial draft was a good size, corrections were made readily, and we started writing it much earlier than the first essay. The fun factor increased in that more outside input was gathered and I had a better understanding of the outside viewpoints around me and those whom I met were very critical but not harsh about their responses. I can't tell what I would've done given the same experience with number one, but the third and final essay will definitely rise in excitement just as #1 has to #2.
The difference in reasons and motive for the two essays was a much larger change, because in the narrative I was simply telling from my point of view and what I saw from a factual and witness statement. However, in a position paper I was forced to go out and get what others had seen and done, and the interpersonal contact and some interviews I had arranged made it more emotional than the narrative, granting a much bigger freedom and exciting outlook on the essay.
Though a larger difference between my essays was their topic, I found that the blogging tool allowed me to look back on drafts from anywhere I wanted and had more stages, which filled me with a sense of accomplishment and gave me more motivation to continue onward. Each in-between assignment also helped fill in and refine the second essay to a more professional level, whereas the first was simply a "What are we capable of" in a sense, at least it was how I felt.
Where the essays had the greatest difference in was the time-frame that we did them. The first essay was still well into the winter, whereas in a position paper we're in winter to spring, a time of change and to move on, to see new things blooming. I found it symbolic and very uplifting to fill the page with words of wisdom and guidance to the positions I spoke out for.
The similarities now of the two are that they had both been done in at least one draft on this blog, but the more there were in this second one, the more stages there are to look back on and adjust the essay to. Plus, we had each other to speak to and rely on for assistance in varying points that we didn't notice in both times. The only difference in that being how many times we as a group did so. There is a more personal impression in seeing the writings and opinions of your friends while they are reading and accrediting yours in any manner. At times though, I still feel as if I wasn't going easy enough into a topic which I was passionate about, and it might harm my credibility later on, but I cannot judge or tell until the final call comes.
Havrilesky's essay analysis and answers
1.) Heather's main insight is how Mad Men approaches the reality and truth of what the "American Dream" really is, and uses it heavily in her essay so much that she rides on it the whole time. She shows to be passionate about the show and loves it to the point that she flawlessly uses the details of it in her essay.
2.) She establishes authority by talking down the wide fantasies of the american dream and talks about how down-to-earth that Mad Men is, thereby trying to put herself on equal footing to talk about it to us in a conversational term.
3.) It appeals primarily in the first paragraph how the american dream has become very broad and not tailored to the individual's own goals, thereby making the reader interested in what alternative there might be.
4.) I've never watched Mad Men, so I cannot understand the deep connection to the characters and their points and depth, but Havrilesky made me think that the show is worthwhile and that I may just watch it myself to get a good view and insight on what she believes is the "reality" of the American Dream.
2.) She establishes authority by talking down the wide fantasies of the american dream and talks about how down-to-earth that Mad Men is, thereby trying to put herself on equal footing to talk about it to us in a conversational term.
3.) It appeals primarily in the first paragraph how the american dream has become very broad and not tailored to the individual's own goals, thereby making the reader interested in what alternative there might be.
4.) I've never watched Mad Men, so I cannot understand the deep connection to the characters and their points and depth, but Havrilesky made me think that the show is worthwhile and that I may just watch it myself to get a good view and insight on what she believes is the "reality" of the American Dream.
Position Essay
Why homeschooling should not be placed on a higher standard than public school
I went into some deep thought about how
homeschooling is thought of by the world as well as in America in various
states. The state governments in the extreme corners of the states do not seem
to be very allowing of any regular homeschool regiment. Speaking from a
perspective of living in the four corners of the United States at some point in
my homeschooling life, I can say that homeschooling is a very efficient process
when properly used and enjoyed, but can be diluted by the system surrounding it
which is regulated by the state government's school board which has mostly
public school oriented administrators. Homeschoolers should not be placed on a
higher standard than public school students and both should have equal
opportunity in all fields, from military to educational, and even to get out of
high school.
Georgia state legislation, according to the Home
School Defense and Law Association, requires that every homeschool student have
at least a single four and a half hour unbroken session of learning each day,
and requires a detailed report on how much the student only seemed to learn.
Though this as a concept isn't bad, the sheer fact that it needs to be an
unbroken session (meaning no breaks and constant "Learning") just
restricts the freedoms of a homeschooler to make them work more to get a proper
education on their schedule. Florida has less of a time frame but still
requires that the session be unbroken and uninterrupted even with family
emergencies. In order for homeschoolers to have a stable curriculum with
effective learning, they need to not be forced to sit and wait and be unable to
work in the manner that works best for them, rendering homeschooling useless.
The forces at work over in the Georgia legislative branch have made it
undesirable to homeschool, and therefore are just adding to the issue of
homeschoolers getting diplomas and college scholarships.
Texas is one of the few states that actually
understands homeschooling and frees it up to where someone just needs to say
they are homeschooling their child to qualify and be able to graduate.
According to the laws in Texas, a homeschooling parent would only need to
submit a letter of intent to homeschool in order to be granted the rights to
homeschool. Granted, this may just add to the false stereotype of "Dumb
Texans"; however, there are plenty of intelligent people who have come out
of those systems because they were able to achieve more by recalling detail of
what they learned versus what a manuscript from a public high school had told
them in interviews. Frank Mattosh, a retired Marine and survivor of Pearl
Harbor, said “Homeschooling helped me develop the problem solving skills and
decision making that helped me get my men to safety on that day.” Several
Commanders and Captains in the Navy in modern day America came out of
homeschooling programs, including: Commander Chad Hennings, Commander Andrew
Wiest, and Captain Douglas Perry.
Though there are instances where homeschoolers and
parents of those homeschoolers end up abusing the system to "Make up"
a diploma so that they're not forced into spending more money or having to send
in the actual reports and various paperwork involved to make sure education is
being given to the child. Though, this mindset still creates a problem of
homeschoolers having to do more to get their diploma and to apply to colleges
and various other organizations, such as the military. Personally, I’ve had
trouble moving about the states and getting the letter of intent to homeschool
into the school boards as they do not agree with homeschooling proper. The
instances of peoples’ own choices into faking homeschooling are part of what
makes it more difficult to advance in most careers in life, and only serves to
worsen the reputation of Homeschoolers. Though, if any school board or
administration had faith in the families and not wanting just more grades into
their system, homeschoolers would have a much easier time living their daily
lives.
The Military applies more harsh standards to
homeschoolers by making them jump through more hoops to try to enlist or even
get on commission to be an officer. They have to make better test scores in
both PT and the ASVAB to enlist in any portion of the military, while public
schoolers have to make much less score points to pass and enlist. These tests
are respectively the physical fitness and training and the actual test, much
like the SAT or ACT, to get into the military. This unfairness results in both
a rejection of the homeschoolers who met the public school standard, and only
brings more competent homeschoolers into the military itself be it Marine,
Navy, Air Force, or Army. A manner to make the military equal opportunity with
filters is to make the scores equal for all walks of life, not making any
mandatory pre-requisites or certifications to attempt to join the military.
After all, the military was designed
Homeschoolers
themselves are not incompetent, or even unfit for college. Many Ivy League
colleges take in a decent amount of homeschoolers yearly. Each year Harvard University takes up to 10
applicants who have had some home schooling. “In general, those kids do just
fine,” says David Illingsworth, senior admissions officer. He adds that the
number of applications and inquiries from home schoolers is “definitely
increasing.” A Havard administrations officer also stated that homeschool
students “have done very well. They usually are very motivated in what they
do.” Where the students still have to do more even to apply. Though any Ivy
League would be cautious about who they allow into the system, so it makes
sense to double check homeschoolers in areas of confirmation. Results of the
SAT and SAT II, an essay, an interview, and a letter of recommendation are the
main requirements for home educated applicants. On top of that, we have Jon
Reider, Stanford’s senior associate director of admissions. “Home-schoolers
bring certain skills – motivation, curiosity, the capacity to be responsible
for their education – that high schools don’t induce very well,” which is
further reinforcing that homeschoolers need to be taken seriously and placed on
the same level of public schoolers.
All
of these facts are important because homeschooling has proven to be an effective
learning system, but a homeschooler as smart as a public schooler is forced to
do more to get into any kind of recognition or job outside of high school. The
truth is skewed by the lack of knowledge and understanding put out by school
boards and various teachers who want more students to acquire a higher pay by
taxes or raise, or even for better chances at tenure. Getting down to the
basics, Homeschoolers are generally accepted by the world in college primarily,
but have trouble in every other area if they have chosen not to get a college
degree, mostly seen in the military and various states. So no, homeschooling
shouldn’t be forced to do more in order to accomplish the same goals of public
schoolers in everyday life and should be given an equal opportunity in every
respect to advance their own education and career goals.
Sources: hslda.org, interview of Retired Marine 1st
Lieutenant Frank Mattosh, review of Texas Legislation (Unmarked)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)